Re: Future of the Monarchy
Originally Posted by
Twink55
->
You are not alone in that Pixie! I am sure many people appreciated how much he helped injured army people and, if so many people want to get rid of the Royal family, why are they not applauding him for being the first to go?
f we are honest, the queen would never have come to the throne if her uncle hadn't decided that Mrs Simpson was a better option than being kingI.
Charles, her son, needed a brood mare, so married Diana... but continued to to have a relationship Camilla, the woman he loved.
Most people believe that Andrew was involved in a sex scandal.
At least Harry has stayed with his wife, and whether we like her or not, he has brought a lot less disgrace to the family than his father & uncle did.
They are a family and maybe they have all made mistakes, just like most other families. I hope they can find a way to get over their problems & still care about each other.... because that is how all families should be!
I am just grateful that the press don't go out of their way to damage all families with their invasive press reports!
The queen would never have come to the throne if her uncle hadn't decided that Mrs Simpson was a better option than being king.
Many historians believe that a spell of mumps in Edward's youth rendered the Duke of Windsor royally infertile.
That would explain why he married a woman past her child bearing prime at 40. Allegedly she made a comment that he was a 'seedless raisin'. A problem he did not want revealed, probably. Not having an heir his niece would be Queen if he had not abdicated.