Re: The Crime of Treason
You're talking tosh again. The article you quote refers to people who were naturalised Australians and who were dual nationals - quite a different situation.
From the article you quote:
"The anti-terror laws mean Australians can have their citizenship cancelled if they also hold citizenship of another nation and therefore are not left stateless."
The OP did not say the those concerned were dual nationals merely that they were British. Let's just pop you back under your rock where you are safe and warm and away from the confusion of reality.
Originally Posted by
ruthio
->
"The UK is attempting to block the return of at least nine Britons held in Syria over links to Islamic State, according to the Telegraph
It says five suspects - including two members of an IS group dubbed the "Beatles" - have already been named, but the identities of two others, as well as two women and their children, are being protected.
The paper calls on the government to update the crime of treason if it feels there's not enough evidence to try them here.
It quotes a senior official for the semi-autonomous Kurdish enclave in Syria - where many of the fighters are held - as saying Britain should take on its moral and humanistic duty towards its citizens."
Given the news today about the British jihadists who are presently being held in Syria (see above)...do you think it's high time the laws relating to the crime of Treason are updated?
What would you recommend?