Re: Supreme Court nominee accused
Bakerman, it certainly is a case of "he said, she said".
It is also quite disturbing that anyone in a high position or running for high office, can so easily be accused of historical sex crimes.
Her reason for not reporting it at the time was apparently because she was frightened of telling her parents that she had returned to the boys house and had drank a bottle of beer.
Well, who am I to say who is telling the truth and who isn't? but I really believe that apart from sex crimes committed on children by their own parents, siblings or relatives, there should be a time limit on when accusations should be levelled at someone such as in the case of Brett Kavanaugh, who has been selected for one of the highest offices in the USA.
It seems so unfair. Equally disturbing was having to watch her give evidence with all the tears and then watch as he became emotional as he pleaded to be believed that he was completely innocent of the accusation.
Something is very wrong there. It is definitely a case of "was she convincing enough" or "was he convincing enough". Without proof, this should not be happening to him.
Just my opinion of course.