Re: Sajid Javid - Saviour or Self-Serving?
Originally Posted by
Uncle Joe
->
Total bullsh*t!!! - Political asylum and the consequent 'refugees' has nothing whatsoever to do with the Schengen agreement but arose out of the 1948 convention. Thus, if Javid wants to deport them back to France from whence they came, there is nothing to legally debar him from doing so !!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_asylum
Impediment to expulsion,[1]*or*prohibition of deportation,[2][3]*are practical or legal barriers that prevents a country from enforcing an*expulsion*or*deportation*decision of a non-national. In some countries and cases, a person who has been*asylum seeker*but has received negative decision, may still be entitled to reside in the country where the person has applied for a*residence permit*due to such impediments, and may get a temporary or permanent residence permit. In other countries and cases, the person would be considered an*undocumented*(also known as illegal or irregular) immigrant, or may be in an undefined legal state.
Examples of impediments to expulsion in certain countries are:
The home country refuses to receive the person.The foreigner's identity was not established.Transport is not possible.Serious difficulties would arise due to the foreigner's health conditionNew*asylum reasons*occur after the deportation decision, with reference to the principle of*non-refoulement*in the international*Refugee Convention. The*European Court of Human Rights, referring to the*European Convention on Human Rights, has shown in a number of indicative judgments that there are enforcement barriers to expulsion to certain*