17-05-2019, 04:04 PM
122
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Tough is not the answer. These unwanted young men have committed no crime in the UK. Often they have in their own country, which is therefore glad to see the last of them. They don't want them back. You have no way to convince that country, or to force it in receiving these men.You can't put them in jail, remember, no crime. So you put them in shelters. They are free to leave and visit surrounding villages where they are a disturbance and annoyance. If they commit a crime, are caught and convicted, you put them in your prisons already full of british criminals of which you have plenty.
Perhaps you can start a prison colony on some of the scottish islands? I noticed on this forum some who might be suited to perform guard duties there.
Really?
You misunderstand International Law and what we can and cannot do.
I freely admit that my knowledge of many things is severely lacking and in some instances laughable.
I cannot even put up a cooker hood properly, nor can I take a decent photograph.
I do know , in depth, about certain things, Immigration, illegals and Terrorists for example.
I do not presume to lecture others on their specialisms.
I would not lecture Barry on joinery, fender or OGF about engineering, Mups on Dogs, Rhian on Art, Twinks on cats, Silver Tabby on crafts, Azure on painting, Surfermom on Astronomy, Judd on electrics, the list is endless.
I prefer to listen and learn.
Please refrain from lecturing me about things I do know about, you might even learn something.
I fully accept that others may disagree with me,have different opinions, but facts are facts.
I have posted previously how I hold your Dutch Staff and Systems in the highest regard and that we have much to learn from them.
They are much tougher than ours.
Which was the point of my post.
17-05-2019, 04:45 PM
123
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
I've just watched this interview again and what strikes me is how biased the BBC are. Farage noted at one point that at all his rallies there has been zero BBC coverage. They just dismiss him as an outsider loon don't they?Marr obviously had his script written by BBC big wigs telling him how to approach the interview and what questions he should ask and it wouldn't surprise me if the government were behind those questions too.
Hence, Farage's annoyance at the way Andrew Marr kept on harking back to past issues and completely ignoring the present and what Nigel was really there to talk about - his Brexit party.
17-05-2019, 05:55 PM
124
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiReally?
You misunderstand International Law and what we can and cannot do.
I freely admit that my knowledge of many things is severely lacking and in some instances laughable.
I cannot even put up a cooker hood properly, nor can I take a decent photograph.
I do know , in depth, about certain things, Immigration, illegals and Terrorists for example.
I do not presume to lecture others on their specialisms.
I would not lecture Barry on joinery, fender or OGF about engineering, Mups on Dogs, Rhian on Art, Twinks on cats, Silver Tabby on crafts, Azure on painting, Surfermom on Astronomy, Judd on electrics, the list is endless.
I prefer to listen and learn.
Please refrain from lecturing me about things I do know about, you might even learn something.
I fully accept that others may disagree with me,have different opinions, but facts are facts.
I have posted previously how I hold your Dutch Staff and Systems in the highest regard and that we have much to learn from them.
They are much tougher than ours.
Which was the point of my post.
17-05-2019, 06:13 PM
126
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
Originally Posted by Floydy
->
I've just watched this interview again and what strikes me is how biased the BBC are. Farage noted at one point that at all his rallies there has been zero BBC coverage. They just dismiss him as an outsider loon don't they?Marr obviously had his script written by BBC big wigs telling him how to approach the interview and what questions he should ask and it wouldn't surprise me if the government were behind those questions too.
Hence, Farage's annoyance at the way Andrew Marr kept on harking back to past issues and completely ignoring the present and what Nigel was really there to talk about - his Brexit party.
17-05-2019, 06:28 PM
127
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
Erm, something strange going on here.Are we or are we not going to the polls on 23rd May to DEMOCRATICALLY vote for our members of the European Parliament?
This after being told/lied to/mis-informed/conned/deceived/beguiled/betrayed/swindled/cheated/mislead, that the EU is not democratic. AND YET!!!!!!!!!
The mind boggles with the number of people with NPD on this forum.
17-05-2019, 07:37 PM
128
Re: Andrew v Nigel!
Originally Posted by Floydy
->
I've just watched this interview again and what strikes me is how biased the BBC are. Farage noted at one point that at all his rallies there has been zero BBC coverage. They just dismiss him as an outsider loon don't they?Marr obviously had his script written by BBC big wigs telling him how to approach the interview and what questions he should ask and it wouldn't surprise me if the government were behind those questions too.
Hence, Farage's annoyance at the way Andrew Marr kept on harking back to past issues and completely ignoring the present and what Nigel was really there to talk about - his Brexit party.
He, and the Brexit Party, must really annoy them and I find that highly amusing!
Should the Brexit Party ever get into government, the BBC will wish they had never treated them in the way they have (and still are), as they may well find themselves disestablished in their present form!
|
|
