Re: Hypnotism
There needs to be a definition of hypnosis really for this debate to be effective.
It's not generally what people think it is.
Take Derren Brown. If you've watched his stuff you will have seen that he frequently "hypnotises" his stage participants but it's not actually hypnosis as people usually interpret that term.
The people he uses generally know him and his work. They don't want to embarrass Derren and they have seen the way other people react on his shows and so they act likewise. This is why, no matter how many people he "hypnotises" they all react in the same way. They stand there and let their heads droop and their arms drop to their sides. No-one ever just drops to the floor, sits down, lies down
Another way people describe hypnosis is people susceptible to the power of suggestion. What is actually happening is people are willingly going along with the proceedings. So no-one is being controlled or forced, they are
willing participants simply playing a role.
People are always at different stages of life. Many are very vulnerable, lacking self confidence, awareness and many give in easily to any outward pressure. Many people go to mediums, clairvoyants, gurus. They go for Reiki healings or learn Reiki themselves. They can and do get sucked in by all manner of stuff because, like everyone else, they need answers, they are searching, they need to know.
So they will WILLINGLY submit to a clairvoyant's spiel or a cold reader's well honed system of trickery.
Some would say they've been hypnotised but I wouldn't.
That's why you need a definition.
It IS possible to put someone in a suggestive state but it requires drugs in some form.
It is also possible to dupe people through various techniques. Social conditioning, brainwashing, advertising, peer pressure, religion and so on.
You could say that millions are already hypnotised through the power of those techniques.