Re: Teachers working long hours
One thing that is overlooked is that teachers have nowhere to run and hide when they're in front of a class of children. There's no taking a breather or deciding to have a bit of a quiet lesson for a change (giving the children a test instead of teaching them is fool's gold, since the hour or so of doing this is immediately lost by the simple fact that these tests need to be marked, which usually takes far longer than an hour).
Not all, but many other jobs do allow one to take one's foot off the pedal for a few minutes for a quick re-charge of the batteries or to ave a quick and undisturbed moment to reflect/think. Not possible in front of a class!!
As for the lengthy holidays, there is an argument that suggests that teachers could possibly earn far more money if they had decided to enter other professions, and therefore are paid pro-rata for 39 weeks pa. This view is one that I suspect will be shot down in flames by many on here, but I throw it into the pot anyway.
Teachers don't decide to work for 39 weeks of the year. This is set by historical norms. Teachers are contracted to complete 1265 hours of work pa, which has been spread into 39 weeks (195 day, of which 190 are allocated for direct contact with pupils). Obviously, 1265 is rarely enough to complete all of the work which is expected of them and most teachers work above this time allowance.
Personally, I think there's a strong case for the number of days to increase, with a shorter amount of working hours per day. How this would impact on the childminding aspect of the process (while parents are at work safe in the knowledge that their offspring are being kept safe and supervised for all but an hour or so of the non-overlap times) would be an issue. Unless, heaven forbid, extra provision is provided more or less solely for babysitting purposes.