Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by
AnnieS
->
Firstly the voting public never accept an election result if they voted otherwise. The opposition spend the next few years attacking the winners. So this is not new.
Secondly leave mps never had an interest in a deal because no deal was their aim. So if no deal was agreed it's because David Davis turned up with his empty briefcase intending to do nothing.
You make a lot of assumptions about the voting public AnnieS
We never knew what we were voting for!
We never accept a result if we lose, etc etc!
Who are you to cast these judgements on us?
Have you ever seen or heard such shyte taking place before
now? I dont think so?
Where 80% of parliament are actively engaged in subverting
the majority decision of the people ie( democracy )By any and
All means possible, including passing makeshift laws at short
notice to prevent the lawful implementation of the peoples
will! In other times it would be called treason?
Thats the stuff that monarchs and dictators used to do and
And YOU agree with it!!
This would not have happened if TM had not given away her
majority, l have wondered if she did it purposely as she was
such a remainer at heart??
Regards Donkeyman!