14-05-2020, 08:49 AM
11
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
HiI like porbeagles, great fun to catch.
I do not eat them.
Brexit will not be good for me.
My favourite wrecks will be out of bounds.
I can live with that.
The one thing I will not be doing is going to France to fish them from there.
I will not give them a penny.
14-05-2020, 10:13 AM
12
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Nothing to do with any transition period or the EU. Scottish Government spokeswoman said, “We are aware that a multi-national fleet is legitimately operating in shared waters under the Faroese Government’s authority, and has done for a number of years.Years! So its not even news? https://londonlovesbusiness.com/russ...supertrawlers/
Post), that the area involved was declared an internatioal
fishing conservancy area a couple of years ago by the EU??
And also that dutch super trawlers were observed dredging there
on earlier occasions aswell??
FISHING IN INTERNATIONAL CONSERVANCY AREAS !! Solly??
Cant you read?
Donkeyman!! 😟😟
14-05-2020, 10:24 AM
13
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiI like porbeagles, great fun to catch.
I do not eat them.
Brexit will not be good for me.
My favourite wrecks will be out of bounds.
I can live with that.
The one thing I will not be doing is going to France to fish them from there.
I will not give them a penny.
I wonder if the sharks find it great fun to be caught?
Or any fish for that matter.
To be feeding, as all living creatures must do, and have a viscous sharp hook embed itself in their mouth and find themselves being dragged through the water, terrified, in pain, and powerless to escape.
Not even to be eaten, but just to give some strange "pleasure" to their torturer.
Sport fishing? A classic example of an oxymoron if ever there was.
And yes, it has been conclusively proven that fish DO experience pain.
14-05-2020, 11:16 AM
14
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by The Artful Todger
->
I wonder if the sharks find it great fun to be caught? Or any fish for that matter.
To be feeding, as all living creatures must do, and have a viscous sharp hook embed itself in their mouth and find themselves being dragged through the water, terrified, in pain, and powerless to escape.
Not even to be eaten, but just to give some strange "pleasure" to their torturer.
Sport fishing? A classic example of an oxymoron if ever there was.
And yes, it has been conclusively proven that fish DO experience pain.
I think that, as with hunting animals,
I you catch it, you must eat it, and that includes gutting and skinning
as well!!
As you say hunting for FUN is an oxymoron!
Donkeyman! 😟😟
14-05-2020, 11:21 AM
15
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by The Artful Todger
->
I wonder if the sharks find it great fun to be caught? Or any fish for that matter.
To be feeding, as all living creatures must do, and have a viscous sharp hook embed itself in their mouth and find themselves being dragged through the water, terrified, in pain, and powerless to escape.
Not even to be eaten, but just to give some strange "pleasure" to their torturer.
Sport fishing? A classic example of an oxymoron if ever there was.
And yes, it has been conclusively proven that fish DO experience pain.
I have to agree with Todger's post Swim.
If someone catches a rabbit or fish because they need food, I could understand that.
But we don't trap birds, rabbits, poultry, lambs etc and release them again, just for fun - so why Fish?
Why traumatise any creature merely for human pleasure?
14-05-2020, 11:31 AM
16
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiI like porbeagles, great fun to catch.
I do not eat them.
Brexit will not be good for me.
My favourite wrecks will be out of bounds.
I can live with that.
The one thing I will not be doing is going to France to fish them from there.
I will not give them a penny.
Selsey is great for hounds. Fished there a few times and had to run after my rods up the beach.
14-05-2020, 11:32 AM
17
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by Mups
->
I have to agree with Todger's post Swim.If someone catches a rabbit or fish because they need food, I could understand that.
But we don't trap birds, rabbits, poultry, lambs etc and release them again, just for fun - so why Fish?
Why traumatise any creature merely for human pleasure?
Thats why we should ban catch and release.
I take it you don't eat fish?
14-05-2020, 12:19 PM
18
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Maybe they are after the killer whales !https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2...ZWDHGgqJKejZhQ
14-05-2020, 12:27 PM
19
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by Bread
->
Thats why we should ban catch and release.I take it you don't eat fish?
Yes, I do eat fish, Bread.
But I hope they are not caught and released 10 times first just to show someone's so-called 'skills.'
14-05-2020, 01:54 PM
20
Re: Russian trawlers in scottish waters??
Originally Posted by Donkeyman
->
Can you satisfy me on the fact,( that you verified in your earlierPost), that the area involved was declared an internatioal
fishing conservancy area a couple of years ago by the EU??
And also that dutch super trawlers were observed dredging there
on earlier occasions aswell??
FISHING IN INTERNATIONAL CONSERVANCY AREAS !! Solly??
Cant you read?
Donkeyman!! 😟😟
Maintaining these zones is a matter for the UK. At the moment 40% of british waters are protected. So you should chase away those russians, or is that too big a challenge?
UK goes top of European protection ranking with 41 new marine conservation zones
https://www.undercurrentnews.com/201...rvation-zones/
The UK government has been praised by environmental NGO Oceana for creating 41 new marine conservation zones (MCZs) one week ahead of World Oceans Day.* The new zones will be added to the UK existing tally, bringing it to a total coverage of 91 zones
The news brings the UK to the top of Oceana's leaderboard in terms of marine protection in Europe, with 40% of its waters now protected.* "We hope that all 91 zones will be properly managed, and no bottom-trawl fishing allowed, which harms habitats ...
|
|
