Re: Men only. No women
I agree with Bakerman.
Women have finally achieved equality with men in almost all respects, and so they should, respecting physical differences of course.
I don't know about America, but in the UK there are still glaring examples of women not being paid the same amount as men doing exactly the same job. This is something that must change or there really isn't any true equality of the sexes.
If and when we do have true sexual equality, then this must include what Bakerman is arguing for.
Of course, we don't have compulsory military recruitment, but if we did it would be perfectly logical (and in my opinion correct) for women to be included as well as men assuming, of course, that women were assigned to duties appropriate to their gender and physique.
What possible argument against that can there be?