05-02-2019, 06:26 PM
21
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by Bread
->
We don't do that for goods coming from anywhere else in the world
05-02-2019, 06:39 PM
22
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Perhaps you should have read swimfeeders posts. He seems tireless in endavouring to help people understand international trade. Just look up his posts and educate yourself.
05-02-2019, 07:16 PM
23
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Perhaps you should have read swimfeeders posts. He seems tireless in endavouring to help people understand international trade. Just look up his posts and educate yourself.
Oh dear ....
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-br...-idUKKCN1PU1UU
05-02-2019, 07:27 PM
24
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
Dover cross channel ferries carried 2,600,000 trucks.
That is a hell of a lot of paperwork.
It will simply all be done online. It was mentioned as such on the radio this week. Truck drivers will simply fill forms in online.
05-02-2019, 08:26 PM
28
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by Judd
->
A chap from the Bristol port authority said in an interview that Bristol could handle any trucks using its ports in the event of a no-deal Brexit as the great majority of their existing trade is done under WTO already and hardly any from the EU. Sounds like another option to me.
https://www.bristolferry.com
05-02-2019, 08:29 PM
29
Re: The Dover Proposal.
Originally Posted by marmaduke
->
I think today you will find most of the trucks coming through Dover carry foreign plates carrying foreign goods so may I suggest the length of the queue is a foreigners problem 
Makes no odds to me in the slightest if a polish Lithuanian Bulgarian truck sits in a queue all week any more than it bothers me a load of Spanish lettuce is spoilt in transit .... again that is an EU problem
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
