Re: Printing photos
Today's file formats or storage devices becoming redundant as years roll on probably isn't too much to worry about. It is likely there will always be ways of converting current photo file formats to any new ones that we don't know about yet, also transferring photo files to any other future storage media. I therefore feel that photos stored digitally now will be around for future generations to see on whatever devices are still waiting to be invented.
This all being provided that society doesn't break down and that there is always going to be power generated to run the devices. If not, that's when prints could be the only photographic record there is left of previous generations.
If printed photos are to last for generations to come, then the longevity and storage of them needs some consideration. Inkjet prints will eventually fade if displayed on a shelf, window sill or other places around the house, just like prints developed from negatives can. This will depend on how sunny or light the position is though. Fading might not matter too much if the photos have been stored as a file as well. Then they can be re-printed once in a while.
Inkjet prints kept in an album (and so in the dark) ought to last forever but who knows?
If intending to do quite a bit of printing and prints need to be future-proof, then a
dye-sublimation printer might be the best type of printer to use. The longevity of prints is said to be better and (having seen the prints produced) I'd say the quality of them is about as good as photos developed in the old way from negatives. Prints work out at about 3 Pence each. A Canon dye-sub printer is more or less the same price as a decent quality inkjet printer.
If interested, there is a discussion here about print longevity and dye-sub versus inkjet printers.
https://www.betterphoto.com/forms/Qn...threadID=28456