30-10-2016, 10:47 AM
11
Re: Clinton v Trump
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
What puzzles me is in a country the size of the USA are these two really the best they can come up with. Some of the American off members would do a better job than either of them.
30-10-2016, 11:43 AM
12
Re: Clinton v Trump
Trump cannot complain, now the TBI (as we must now call it, I suppose) has played its hand however ridiculous it looks at present - it's the dog whistle, a bloody loud dog whistle, that matters here. Will it have an effect? I fear it will. Can the World cope with an insane neo-facist leading the USA? At least at his age and state of being he will probably be a one-term preseident30-10-2016, 04:16 PM
13
Re: Clinton v Trump
Originally Posted by malcolm
->
Nato are on pre-planned exercises, no build up of forces there !
Care to check your facts?
30-10-2016, 04:19 PM
15
Re: Clinton v Trump
Originally Posted by malcolm
->
no need
You really should before posting rubbish.
30-10-2016, 04:22 PM
16
Re: Clinton v Trump
Originally Posted by Norway
->
If the American Public are so naive as to elect Trump then heaven help America. How thick and stupid can people be to actually back him, but there again thickos following a thicky..........
30-10-2016, 05:07 PM
18
Re: Clinton v Trump
Originally Posted by Longdogs
->
I agree, surely there are better candidates than these two but I suppose it's the same as here, we don't get to choose who we can vote for.
Two other Candidates are at $5% and 2%
Will be interesting to see Johnson results.
|
|
