22-07-2020, 06:34 PM
21
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by john
->
these two, markle & h, are fast becoming great entertainment value, in these dark depressing days. A super double act, guaranteed to come up with fresh material to keep us all laughing. A fitting replacement to the much loved krankies!! 
23-07-2020, 06:37 AM
22
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
Why not ?Has he actually committed a crime ?
Having sex with a 17 year old is not a crime in London and most parts of the world .
I can’t stand the man but as long as the US refuses to extradite that women who killed that young boy by driving on the wrong side of the road why on earth should he cooperate ?
A 17 year old is not exactly a child .
17 year old girls have sex all the time some for love some for money .
Generally one or both of these reasons .
Of course it’s nice for the. if the two go together !
He is being asked to assist the police with their enquiries, that's all.
The fact that he appears to be dodging the Feds - coming, as it does on top of the disastrous Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis - does not show him in a good light.
23-07-2020, 06:45 AM
23
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
True but it will be difficult for anyone to like him again .He had credit in spades ( am I allowed to say this ?) from the British people even from those not enamoured of the royals ,
He turned his back on us and moreover slagged us off so he can get stuffed !
He will end up living somewhere in Africa as a remittance man .
23-07-2020, 08:32 AM
24
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by OldFogey
->
No-one is saying that Andrew has committed a crime.He is being asked to assist the police with their enquiries, that's all.
The fact that he appears to be dodging the Feds - coming, as it does on top of the disastrous Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis - does not show him in a good light.
An arrogant boor who was / is an incubus on the tax payer .
However I am not interested in greedy so called sex slaves trying to get handouts of a dead mans estate .
Haven’t the feds got anything better to do ?
23-07-2020, 09:17 AM
25
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by OldFogey
->
Poor Harry Hewitt.He always was an outsider (by parentage); now the "monarchists" all have it in for him as well.
He and his wife are better off out of the royal madness, though.
Harry Hewitt...
..?
23-07-2020, 09:24 AM
26
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
He never IMO was in a good light .An arrogant boor who was / is an incubus on the tax payer .
However I am not interested in greedy so called sex slaves trying to get handouts of a dead mans estate .
Haven’t the feds got anything better to do ?
You clearly don't think that people-trafficking is important - an interesting place to be mentally.
23-07-2020, 09:43 AM
27
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by OldFogey
->
Victims of so organised and cynical a crime as sex-trafficking have a right to justice and, possibly following that, a right to financial compensation.You clearly don't think that people-trafficking is important - an interesting place to be mentally.
23-07-2020, 11:34 AM
28
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by OldFogey
->
Victims of so organised and cynical a crime as sex-trafficking have a right to justice and, possibly following that, a right to financial compensation.You clearly don't think that people-trafficking is important - an interesting place to be mentally.
These are girls who find having sex for large amounts of money an easy career choice .
No doubt the man was a sleaze .
But if he was that repugnant and things were so bad why did they stay ?
Why did they introduce their friends?
The answer is for easy money.
23-07-2020, 12:38 PM
30
Re: Sussex's again...
Originally Posted by The Artful Todger
->
Given the right T's & C's many people, especially young girls, would LIKE to be trafficked.
I suppose some women would like to be raped, too.
You may not be Artful; but you are most certainly a Todger.
|
|
