Join for free
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
mesco m's Avatar
mesco m
Senior Member
mesco m is offline
manchester
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,277
mesco m is female  mesco m has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 04:04 PM
11

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Originally Posted by Pats CG ->
Thats funny.....
I should have said "Ladies knickers". He may have shown more interest.
Patsy
Chatterbox
Patsy is offline
UK
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 31,549
Patsy is female  Patsy has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 04:07 PM
12

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

...O'h dear - aint we silly sometimes, good laugh tho' eh.....Yea, good to be silly at times, keeps us young - thats my excuse anyway....
fitou143
Senior Member
fitou143 is offline
Essex
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 237
fitou143 is male  fitou143 has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 09:11 PM
13

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Boxers definitely but then there are Boxers then there are Boxers there are some of you that will know what that means and others that won't.
Mags's Avatar
Mags
Supervisor
Mags is offline
South West UK
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 47,931
Mags is female  Mags has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 09:17 PM
14

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Originally Posted by fitou143 ->
Boxers definitely but then there are Boxers then there are Boxers there are some of you that will know what that means and others that won't.
Pardon???
Norway
Senior Member
Norway is offline
i
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,150
Norway is male  Norway has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 09:33 PM
15

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Are we talking about , flappy boxers or the ummm close fitting type?
spitfire
Chatterbox
spitfire is offline
Warwickshire
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 29,878
spitfire is male  spitfire has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 10:58 PM
16

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

OK, the intent from the thread was to say, in the 70's whilst "Bed Hopping" Boxers weren't invented, it was Y fronts or Au Naturel, post this point in history, Boxers have proved to be more practical, but I hasten to say, retrospectively, practical would have been less fun.
spitfire
Chatterbox
spitfire is offline
Warwickshire
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 29,878
spitfire is male  spitfire has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-04-2013, 10:59 PM
17

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Originally Posted by Norway ->
Are we talking about , flappy boxers or the ummm close fitting type?
Flappy for practicality, close fitting for posers.
Grouse
Senior Member
Grouse is offline
planet earth
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 226
Grouse is male  Grouse has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
04-04-2013, 07:43 AM
18

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Neither.

TessA
Official Poinker
TessA is offline
UK
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 21,857
TessA is female  TessA has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
04-04-2013, 08:42 PM
19

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

White cotton Y-fronts! Nothing is more erotic (except maybe combinations)
Michael's Avatar
Michael
Senior Member
Michael is offline
Near London,UK
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 758
Michael is male  Michael has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-04-2013, 12:22 PM
20

Re: Boxers versus Y fronts

Boxer shorts No.1 choice / Chuck the Y fronts in the bin
.

.
 
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread » (Or back to Top)


© Copyright 2009, Over50sForum   Contact Us | Over 50s Forum! | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.