09-09-2014, 02:05 AM
25
Re: A new Royal baby!
What's so exciting about it? She's only just had one so why does she want another one so soon? Yet another royal scrounger entitled to pick the pockets of their humble serfs whilst they live in luxury beyond our wildest dreams and the poorest of this country live in abject poverty.People living on the streets this winter will die, as will old people who can't afford to keep warm or eat properly on a meagre pension. Families who can barely feed themselves and have to thankfully resort to food banks which are now available in many places, but not everywhere. The depressive desperation of people who WANT to work, but can't find a job, so they resort to begging, or stealing.
Their Royal Highnesses are now going to have to spend a few more million of our money refurbishing one of their already luxury rooms to create an extra nursery bringing in specialist designers, wallpaper at £1000 a roll, more nannies etc, at your expense.
I repeat! What's exciting about it?
Sorry, but that's how I feel, and I make no excuse for it.
09-09-2014, 08:11 AM
26
Re: A new Royal baby!
[QUOTE=Mollie;529581]What's so exciting about it? She's only just had one so why does she want another one so soon?Plenty of people have their kids closer together than these two. Who knows whether it was even planned?
People living on the streets this winter will die, as will old people who can't afford to keep warm or eat properly on a meagre pension. Families who can barely feed themselves and have to thankfully resort to food banks which are now available in many places, but not everywhere. The depressive desperation of people who WANT to work, but can't find a job, so they resort to begging, or stealing.QUOTE]
I can't see what that's got to do with the baby Mollie. I very much doubt even more people will die of cold & starvation this winter because Kate's having another child.
She's only got ONE child, not 15 like some families.
We're all entitled to our views though.
09-09-2014, 08:32 AM
27
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by Mups
->
She's only got ONE child, not 15 like some families.
We're all entitled to our views though.
Even worse this one is just a spare in case something happens to the first one and a new King/Queen of Australia is needed in a hurry a few decades down the track.
Still you pay for it not us, I am pleased that the UK is doing so well it can afford another royal bludger (ooops, I mean baby of course).
09-09-2014, 08:47 AM
28
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by Bruce
->
The problem is the people with 15 children, even if they are all on the dole, won't cost the UK as much as this new baby. 09-09-2014, 08:50 AM
30
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by Bruce
->
The problem is the people with 15 children, even if they are all on the dole, won't cost the UK as much as this new baby. Even worse this one is just a spare in case something happens to the first one and a new King/Queen of Australia is needed in a hurry a few decades down the track.
Still you pay for it not us, I am pleased that the UK is doing so well it can afford another royal bludger (ooops, I mean baby of course).
Did you get out of bed the wrong side this morning Bruce?
|
|
