Re: Pritti ups the ante !!!
Originally Posted by
Dextrous63
->
Am curious about the logic being applied by these:
Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, accused the Government of “seeking to unjustly differentiate between the deserving and undeserving refugee by choosing to provide protection for those fleeing war and terror based on how they travel to the UK” and claimed the plans could undermine the country’s traditions of providing protection for people “regardless of how they have managed to find their way to our shores”.
Kolbassia Haoussou, of Freedom from Torture, warned the proposals could see most of the people the charity helps become “criminalised”, adding: “These unreal proposals make it clear that this Government isn’t serious about improving lives and creating a fair asylum system.”
Mike Adamson, chief executive of the British Red Cross, branded the changes “inhumane”.
He said: “We should not judge how worthy someone is of asylum by how they arrived here.
“The proposals effectively create an unfair two-tiered system, whereby someone’s case and the support they receive is judged on how they entered the country and not on their need for protection. This is inhumane.”
If someone who is desparate knocked on my door asking for shelter for the night then their request would be viewed in a different light compared to someone who broke in and claimed squatter's rights.
So, what's the difference?
I am surprised by the red cross viewpoint Dex?
But the rest of that lot are part o f the immigrant industry that's
sprung up in UK, mostly composed of the legal profession
Donkeyman! 👎👎👎