Re: Car free day
Originally Posted by
The Artful Todger
->
Not the same. Not possible to redesign either. They are fundementaly different and I do mean fundementaly.
For example the Lawrence Livermore thing is lead cooled, and it's a fast breeder.
In addition in order to make the thing intrinsically safe it's about 10 metres tall and relies on convection currents within the liquid lead coolant rather than any moving parts that would not survive the 30 year design life. In addition a different fuel is used.
Chalk and cheese springs to mind.
Surely the product of whatever system is used Todgy is
electricity? Which should be easy to tap into the NGrid?
And it is contained in a relatively small vessel, ie, a
submarine, which is manned by humans? So it cant be so
dangerous as you profess,
I also believe the us has developed a really small unit for use
on space vehicles that will have to travel outside of the solar
system, perhaps you could enlighten me on the workings
of these mini nuclear power systems as this subject interests
me muchly?
As for your statement that us is playing catch up with Russia
in the development of small reactors, my thoughts are that
the russian compacts you speak of are or were developed
from their submarines, hence my question why cant we do
the same, with the differance that we can leave the reactor
installed in the vessel as uk is a small island, and anywhere
in UK is within easy reach of the coast? Even London could
have a CLEAN? silent source of extra power at very little
outlay right inside the city?
Whereas Russia's big users of power are mainly thousands
of miles from the coasts and so will need specially designed
inland orientated units!
Regards Donkeyman!