Re: Brexit and Boris.
Originally Posted by
Banchory
->
They are free ports and are recognised as such throughout the world. That they are subject to EU restrictions on state aid etc doesn’t change what there are
Read your statement above Banchory. It is this simple definition of what a Free Port actually is that is causing all your angst and frustration and making you look completely foolish.
Here is YOUR QUOTE from post #88 earlier where you 100% concede that there are Free Ports and other types of Free Ports:
Originally Posted by Banchory
The EU regulations on state aid does make them slightly different to say this in some other countries but they are Free Ports nevertheless and Boris never made this distinction in his statement
You have conceded (quite correctly) that there are different types of Free Ports. The REAL free ports govern their own finances and are not subject to EU taxes and the like. Any Free Ports that would be set up now in the EU would be totally different as you have correctly stated. There would be regulations on state aid and essentially the EU would ensure that the port had no competitive advantage and that there was a level playing field across the EU member states. As such it
WOULD 100% NOT BE A REAL FREE PORT.
The fact that it's actual NAME might contain the words "free port" are irrellevant. By any definition of real free ports used internationally, they would 100% NOT be Free Ports.
Until you stop being a beligerent fool and accept this you won't be able to progress with your stance, which remains utterly facile, totally disingenuous and simply false.
Boris did not lie.