Re: Some interesting potential travel consequences of a no deal Brexit.
Here is an interesting travel option after brexit and having left the European court of Mohamed’s rights ..
Possibly safer air travel as I read from this that profiling isn’t allowed .. the very fact Muslims have screwed everyone travelling by air in that security is major hassle and police aren’t allowed to stop someone even to talk to them is wrong wrong wrong
Al Qaeda chief's wife, 49, wins human rights battle
https://mol.im/a/6770225
She was visiting Djamel Beghal, behind bars for plotting to blow up US embassy
Did you get that ? She was flying to visit her shit for brains husband in jail for terror whilst she lives in the peaceful uk ... not some Islamic country they both love so much but here in the uk taking all the benifits it offers
So a police security sees a Dalek in an airport and thinks it’s worth stopping him/her as there must be someone inside that burka and wham European court straight away
Sylvie Beghal, 49, was stopped at East Midlands Airport after flying to France
She was visiting Djamel Beghal, behind bars for plotting to blow up US embassy
But mother-of-three claimed she was stopped 'without reasonable suspicion'
European court rules her right to respect for private and family life was violated
The wife of an Al Qaeda chief had her human rights breached by UK airport police, European judges have ruled.
Sylvie Beghal, 49, was stopped at East Midlands Airport while returning to Leicester after a visit to her husband Djamel Beghal in a French jail.
The mother of three said she was detained without reasonable suspicion – violating her right to private and family life.
Her claims were rejected by the High Court and Supreme Court but the European Court of Human Rights eventually ruled in her favour.
The Home Office said it was disappointed by the ruling, which it has three months to challenge.
The airport incident in 2011 had led to Mrs Beghal being charged with failing to help officers – an offence under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
Lord Carlile of Berriew, who was the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation from 2001 to 2011, said: 'Schedule 7 is absolutely key to the protection of the public in the UK and to national security.
'It has to be used carefully and proportionately, as recognised when the law was amended in 2014. But I'm very surprised that this case has resulted in such a ruling, particularly given the factual background.
'I fear we have to put this down to a questionable decision by the ECHR. In my view the British courts were right and correctly took their decisions in this case.'
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen, whose constituency covers the airport, said: 'It's sickening. These people are big on human rights but not so much on their responsibilities.
'We all have a duty to cooperate with the police with regards to terrorism and anyone who doesn't want to is breaking the bond of loyalty to our country.