Join for free
Page 24 of 34 « First < 14 22 23 24 25 26 > Last »
bakerman's Avatar
bakerman
Senior Member
bakerman is offline
Mexico
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,589
bakerman is male  bakerman has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
02-10-2018, 10:06 PM
231

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by Right Now ->
Nope, Pres. Clinton wasn't in front of a Senate hearing committee after placing his hand on a bible to tell the truth about a consentual blow job.
Your right wingers can't hold themselves responsible for their actions, must always, and forever and ever, pull in past democrats to hold up as examples for comparison. Just once, how about a debate where they own what they did, all on their own. As for the rest of your comment, it only makes me smile.
You have no idea what frightens me to the core. Never assume you do.
That would be your Own mistake. .

Say what you will, it's about politics. You know it. I know it. Everyone with half a brain knows it. What is happening to Judge Kavanaugh is nothing less than a lynching.

You seem to have convicted the judge without any proof positive. All that remains is to do is to tighten the rope that is already around his neck.
gumbud
Chatterbox
gumbud is offline
australia
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,372
gumbud is male  gumbud has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 12:26 AM
232

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by Muddy ->
What if it was your innocent son that was accused ?
no 'sons' are innocent - they just don't tell you!
bakerman's Avatar
bakerman
Senior Member
bakerman is offline
Mexico
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,589
bakerman is male  bakerman has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 01:01 AM
233

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

The New York times is reporting that the FBI investigation may wrap-up as early as Tuesday night. If so, we can expect a full Senate vote this week.
Muddy's Avatar
Muddy
Chatterbox
Muddy is offline
UK
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 31,286
Muddy is female  Muddy has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 05:50 AM
234

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by bakerman ->
Say what you will, it's about politics. You know it. I know it. Everyone with half a brain knows it. What is happening to Judge Kavanaugh is nothing less than a lynching.

You seem to have convicted the judge without any proof positive. All that remains is to do is to tighten the rope that is already around his neck.
Of course it is !
Bakerman I commend you on your posts in this thread
They have been logical and cool in the face of emotion and distraction .
ruthio
Chatterbox
ruthio is offline
Southern UK
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 11,732
ruthio is female  ruthio has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 10:19 AM
235

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Trump changes his tune with the weather.

He said, of Ford after Prof Ford's dramatic testimony to the Senate committee, when he said her testimony was "very compelling" and described her as a "very fine woman".
He described her as a "credible" and "compelling" witness.

Now he mocks her.
And yet, it is a well known fact that it is not unusual for victims of trauma to remember certain details vividly but have little recollection of other things that the brain may have accorded less significance to.

But re the FBI investigation...

1. They typically never look back as far as 36 years ago, when Prof Ford says the assault took place.

2. Lawyer Greg Rinckey told the Associated Press news agency that agents were normally looking for a "current problem", meaning any issue that has arisen in the past seven to 10 years.

3. Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker has stated that, according to FBI guidelines, investigators typically look back no further than 18 years.

Therefore their conclusions are foregone, the case will be dismissed imho.
A whitewash.
gumbud
Chatterbox
gumbud is offline
australia
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,372
gumbud is male  gumbud has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 12:00 PM
236

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

hundreds of professors reject him - I wonder why?? maybe because he's just a cry baby - man up Kavanaugh - you thought you were a 'man' at the time of the alleged assault??

already a reject heh?
Judd's Avatar
Judd
Chatterbox
Judd is offline
West Riding of Yorkshire
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 12,538
Judd is male  Judd has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 02:35 PM
237

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by ruthio ->
Trump changes his tune with the weather.

He said, of Ford after Prof Ford's dramatic testimony to the Senate committee, when he said her testimony was "very compelling" and described her as a "very fine woman".
He described her as a "credible" and "compelling" witness.

Now he mocks her.
And yet, it is a well known fact that it is not unusual for victims of trauma to remember certain details vividly but have little recollection of other things that the brain may have accorded less significance to.

But re the FBI investigation...

1. They typically never look back as far as 36 years ago, when Prof Ford says the assault took place.

2. Lawyer Greg Rinckey told the Associated Press news agency that agents were normally looking for a "current problem", meaning any issue that has arisen in the past seven to 10 years.

3. Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker has stated that, according to FBI guidelines, investigators typically look back no further than 18 years.

Therefore their conclusions are foregone, the case will be dismissed imho.
A whitewash.
Only if her allegations are true.
tarantula
Chatterbox
tarantula is offline
UK
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,359
tarantula is female  tarantula has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 02:55 PM
238

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by Judd ->
Why, because she's a woman and is therefore incapable of lying?
Because her story seems much more credible than Kavanaugh's rant.
Muddy's Avatar
Muddy
Chatterbox
Muddy is offline
UK
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 31,286
Muddy is female  Muddy has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 02:56 PM
239

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

No it doesn't .
It sounds like a well rehearsed speech from someone well versed in psychobabble.
ruthio
Chatterbox
ruthio is offline
Southern UK
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 11,732
ruthio is female  ruthio has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
03-10-2018, 03:36 PM
240

Re: Supreme Court nominee accused

Originally Posted by tarantula ->
Because her story seems much more credible than Kavanaugh's rant.
I agree.
Not that any of our thoughts and pontificatings will make one iota of difference to the outcome!
Which is a foregone conclusion imho.
 
Page 24 of 34 « First < 14 22 23 24 25 26 > Last »

Thread Tools


© Copyright 2009, Over50sForum   Contact Us | Over 50s Forum! | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.