Re: Guantanamo

Oh dear you are lowering yourself to the Guardian now are you?

Re: Guantanamo

I always read the guardian Purwell .
Open minded intelligent people read widely .
That why well read people can string together sentences of more than four words.
You might try it sometime.

Re: Guantanamo

La La La!

Re: Guantanamo

I am betting "NO".

Re: Guantanamo

Its a well known fact that when tedious men consistently derail threads its sure as eggs because they are frustrated BOFs and are not getting enough nookie .
And they are not getting enough nookie because they are tedious BOFs.

Hard luck old chaps

Re: Guantanamo

Even closed minded, unintelligent people sometimes read widely, but their sources of information are often limited to whatever supports their premeditated convictions. In such cases, they are capable of stringing together sentences consisting of many more than four words .... but really saying nothing at all and are completely incapable of debate. It is not the length of a sentence that determines whether or not one is "open minded" or "intelligent" but rather the contrary. Concise and meaningful logic is more likely to achieve that which you seek. Start with fundamental logic ....


... this is the basis upon which knowledge will eventually be acquired.

Re: Guantanamo

I think it's a bit late for you two .

Re: Guantanamo

+1
Wholeheartedly agree........it sums me up perfectly.

Re: Guantanamo

I am proud of my ability to speak English - as a second language – as well as I do. Your attempt to shame me for it has missed the mark by a mile. If there is any shame at all to be got by your comment, it is yours alone for making it.

Re: Guantanamo

You mean you talk nonsense in Swedish too ?

I am not interested in 'shaming' you because I don't find BOFs interesting .

Suggest you have a cup of cocoa instead.