05-06-2016, 08:08 PM
31
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Wrinkly
->
It is people like Geoff, who keep a forum and debating alive and thriving, long may it last.The important word has just 2 letters US not me.
No debating with his posts just two people defending his bile
He starts a post when any one question him or points out that he is wrong no reply is forth coming.
05-06-2016, 08:10 PM
32
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Purwell
->
Does anyone watch this programme?Osborne and his oppos are too shameless to worry anyway.
Frankly, I don't give a fig.
05-06-2016, 08:13 PM
33
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
Meg is being fair. Joe is stating what he thinks the newspapers are saying and only about Conservatives. When was the last time he criticized the extreme left?
I have never shied away from admitting I am left but more to centre than Geoff.
05-06-2016, 08:22 PM
34
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
Perhaps because everyone thought like him and nobody objected. When some people on here stop calling someone with a different opinion scum or barstewards or implying that they are unfeeling, cruel, unkind and all the other uncomplimentary things the left wing supporters churn out. Or deliberately digging out links to derogatory articles or even worse spin and lies, I'll then ignore it. Until then I'll continue to speak my peace. In my opinion it is the equivalent of the school bully.
Tell me, when do you and your friends ever complain when someone objects to being treated disrespectfully? Why do you always leap to the defence of the offender?
You are wrong that everyone 'must' have agreed with him - plenty didn't, but light banter to get points across was good enough - it was a much happier forum then - we had respect for each other
05-06-2016, 08:43 PM
36
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Patsy
->
Don't get most of your post but I do notice you are usually on Joes threads You are wrong that everyone 'must' have agreed with him - plenty didn't, but light banter to get points across was good enough - it was a much happier forum then - we had respect for each other
05-06-2016, 09:11 PM
37
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by scot37
->
I'm not a regular on here so maybe should not get involved but UJ shows no respect for anyone who doesn't share his extreme left views. I once asked him a question in one of his threads and was addressed as "matey" in his reply which is not the the usual language used in a debate.
To the guys its 'Matey' to the ladies 'darlin' - its just his way, always has been, he means 'no' disrespect by it
He has got my goat at times, but we always got along, but then I'm not too serious a person
05-06-2016, 09:28 PM
38
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by Meg
->
Yes seriously, just read the thread title .'' Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing''
Getting excited over the prospects of 'revelations' that haven't even happened and 'may' be exciting on some reality show really is rather pathetic and would probably not have happened three years ago .
That is my opinion if you don't like it you are free to ignore it Patsy.
Originally Posted by Patsy
->
There are plenty of ridiculous or frivolous threads on here but I don't see the reaction Joe constantly getsI am not in the least 'excited' - as you seem to be Meg
I recall many times, you telling us to 'ignore' a thread or post that is not to our liking - hence my post
.. I don't know why we don't just rig up a coconut shy while we're at it and throw missiles at each other.
05-06-2016, 09:35 PM
40
Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by ruthio
->
So Meg, why didn't you tear into Tpin with his frivolous and what some saw as thoroughly tedious and childish threads?
No call for a post like that you demean your self.
|
|
