Re: Should Madeleine McCann's parents accept blame?
Originally Posted by
Twink55
->
I agree there is no proof of anything, otherwise somebody would have been arrested! The Portugese police were the first to investigate this and I don't think any of us have an idea how well they do the job, but the early days would have been the best time to find evidence. I don't know if we will ever know what happened to Madeliene, but I do think that speculation of what happened achieves nothing. If Gonzalez Amaral had proof of his beliefs they should have been taken to the police that were investigating her disappearance, and if he didn't, he should not have been allowed to write his book on an unsolved crime. He made a lot of money from that book, which is very good reason for thinking he had ulterior motives for writing it!
We cannot solve the crime, but all this thread was asking was for our opinions as to whether The McCanns should accept the blame for her disappearing.
Amaral was the police heading the investigation .
He was also a man being investigated himself over the torture of the mother of the previous little girl who has disappeared only a few miles away from where Madeliene was abducted..
As the investigation brought light on life he was found to be a man deeply in debt.
Despite having a large salary he had huge debts and spent a lot of money .
He needed his job and he needed the money from that book.
Why a man who was being investigated by his own authorities for his conduct in another similar case of child abduction be regarded as an trustworthy authority is beyond comprehension.